First, let me assert that I am a feminist, at least as far
as condemning domestic abuse (and the attitude of men toward women that is
shown by men who feel they can do that sort of thing to their spouses and
girlfriends), condemning sexual harassment, favoring equal pay and equal
opportunity, and encouraging girls to consider any and all traditionally
masculine occupations.
Also, I positively applaud when women in third-world countries start businesses; and I believe women should have control over their own health and reproduction, and do not feel that a man should be able to override the woman's decision. (Sadly, in too many countries, women cannot obtain contraception supplies or even counseling because of the objection of a husband, priest, or some other--usually a male).
Also, I positively applaud when women in third-world countries start businesses; and I believe women should have control over their own health and reproduction, and do not feel that a man should be able to override the woman's decision. (Sadly, in too many countries, women cannot obtain contraception supplies or even counseling because of the objection of a husband, priest, or some other--usually a male).
On the other hand, I find I have to take issue with some of the
claims, assertions, and implications that feminist women seem to use.
I used to work for a woman who was quite the energetic
feminist. One time when she and I were chatting, I referred to one of my female
students--this was community college--as a "girl." Said boss very
quickly said, "I she over 16? If she's over 16, don't refer to her as a 'girl'."
Well, this is nonsense. Never mind that many women refer to
their fellows of that gender as "girls" (or even guys!). Adult men
are often called "boys": the boys in the band, boys' night out, the
boys of summer, our boys in the service. And surely many, if not all, of the
males to whom this term is applied are over 16.
Can you say "double standard"? Maybe even hypocrisy?
Next, women seem to like to facilitate the idea that cancer
is a women's issue: women own cancer, and seem to be trying to make "cancer" synonymous with "breast cancer." Contrary to the impression they foster, breast cancer is not the most common type of cancer.
Both of these are false. According to statistics I just saw, one in three women
will get cancer, whereas for men the figure is one in two! And breast cancer is
the third most common type of cancer. Most common is digestive tract (I would have
thought lung cancer). Second most common is male genital tract cancer. In other
words, more men die from prostate cancer (possibly lumping it with some other
"male genital cancers," if there are others) than women die from
breast cancer. Yet, where are all the marches for prostate cancer, the pink
ribbons, etc.? Women have been very vocal about all the women who are carried
off by breast cancer--and that is a terrible thing, to be sure. (Let me hasten
to point out that I have lost more than one friend to breast cancer, and it has
stricken my family as well.) But by comparison, I have to suppose that men are
just dying in silence.
P.S. Confession, disclaimer, or whatever: I am a survivor of prostate cancer, so maybe I have an axe to grind in all this.
P.S. Confession, disclaimer, or whatever: I am a survivor of prostate cancer, so maybe I have an axe to grind in all this.
Copyright © 2017.
No comments:
Post a Comment