There is a transportation-funding bill before the US Congress. US Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood has called it "the worst transportation bill in 35 years." (LaHood, it should be pointed out, served in the previous administration of President George W. Bush and thus was not originally an Obama appointee, and is in fact a Republican.)
A Republican spokesman defends the bill as providing for improved roads and bridges, and also implies that it will provide jobs and lower the cost of gasoline.
US roads and bridges are deteriorating and need improvements, but the bill will cut funding for urban mass transit in cities like New York and Chicago.
Thus the bill pits the big cities against the suburbs and rural areas—the mass transit riders and the car owners. This should not be surprising and might even be a deliberate intent of the bill, because the cities have tended to be liberal and Democratic, while rural and suburban areas are more often Republican. Thus the Republicans, who currently control Congress, are aiding those they consider their supporters and penalizing those they feel would most likely oppose them in any election.
The US is becoming proverbially polarized, into Red and Blue states. Now one more divisive and polarizing issue has been found.
Update, February 9, 2012.
I have been corrected in a comment (which see): Transportation Secretary LaHood was in fact appointed by Obama.
Copyright © 2012 by Richard Stein
Showing posts with label transportation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label transportation. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
What's Changed in the World. Part 1 - Transportation
This is the first of a series of blog postings on how the world has changed, mainly within my lifetime (sixty-some years), or over a somewhat longer period, since the 1930s. I was made to think about how things are changed or are different by watching, on DVD, an operetta by Kurt Weill called "Street Scene" and set in 1930s New York.
1. Transportation
In transportation, while some things have changed, some things really have not changed a lot. We still have cars, and they run on gas, a few hybrid cars notwithstanding and the imminent coming of plug-in electric cars notwithstanding. Nor would I radically qualify what I say for the existence of a few vehicles that run on propane, biodiesel, or whatever.
And we still have buses, trucks, and subways that are not basically changed (although the city of Chicago boasts of running several hundred hybrid buses). No, I won't say transportation has changed radically until we see vehicles powered by radical new fuels, or lots of high-speed or maglev trains in the U.S.
True, cars have changed in that they've gotten much more sophisticated, with more systems onboard for convenience and safety; and they are more powerful and thus faster. (A big 1930s Buick might have had only 80 horsepower or so, whereas now auto makers are bringing out models with 500 and 600 horsepower. I'm not sure I understand why.)
At one point—from the 1920s through, say, the '50s--long car trips were fostered by famous long highways like Route 66, which ran from Chicago to Los Angeles. A whole new car-centered culture sprang up, with the innovation of "motor hotels" (later to be called motels) and other roadside businesses that sprang up along the great road to serve the masses of travelers. Route 66 and its ilk were made obsolete by the Interstate Highway system, preached, if you will, by President Eisenhower much as medieval popes preached the Crusades, but not completed for a couple decades. (The system as originally envisioned was completed in 1992 but Interstate highways continue to be built. Under another view, the final leg of the original system is being completed right now.*)
Planes, I must admit, made a qualitative leap when passenger aircraft started to be jet-powered. (Jets can fly faster, higher, and smoother.) But what has changed much more than the available modes of transportation is their utilization. Fifty, sixty, seventy years ago people commonly rode on trains (just look at old movies). Today many people have never ridden on a train. When Amtrak took over the operation of passenger rail service in America in 1971, it dropped half of the existing trains; many smaller towns, and the small cities where I spent my youth—Scranton, PA and Wilkes-Barre, PA—no longer had any train service.
The flip side of people not relying on trains for their travel was of course the increase in air travel. And not only did planes replace trains for overland travel, planes replaced ships even more completely for trans-oceanic travel. It's still possible to cross the Atlantic on a ship, but our everyday travel—for business and almost as completely for pleasure—now is done on planes. If speed is your criterion, it's no contest: you'll take the plane rather than a ship. And with trains as compared with planes, it's understandable that not many people care to spend two or three days on a train for those longer trips.
Another thing once associated with trains but now long gone is Railway Express. Individuals and businesses could use it to send parcels. Think of it as the predecessor of UPS. I sent a big steamer trunk with my clothes to my new address when I was starting grad school.
___________
*Wikipedia, s.v. Amtrak.
Copyright © 2010 by Richard Stein
1. Transportation
In transportation, while some things have changed, some things really have not changed a lot. We still have cars, and they run on gas, a few hybrid cars notwithstanding and the imminent coming of plug-in electric cars notwithstanding. Nor would I radically qualify what I say for the existence of a few vehicles that run on propane, biodiesel, or whatever.
And we still have buses, trucks, and subways that are not basically changed (although the city of Chicago boasts of running several hundred hybrid buses). No, I won't say transportation has changed radically until we see vehicles powered by radical new fuels, or lots of high-speed or maglev trains in the U.S.
True, cars have changed in that they've gotten much more sophisticated, with more systems onboard for convenience and safety; and they are more powerful and thus faster. (A big 1930s Buick might have had only 80 horsepower or so, whereas now auto makers are bringing out models with 500 and 600 horsepower. I'm not sure I understand why.)
At one point—from the 1920s through, say, the '50s--long car trips were fostered by famous long highways like Route 66, which ran from Chicago to Los Angeles. A whole new car-centered culture sprang up, with the innovation of "motor hotels" (later to be called motels) and other roadside businesses that sprang up along the great road to serve the masses of travelers. Route 66 and its ilk were made obsolete by the Interstate Highway system, preached, if you will, by President Eisenhower much as medieval popes preached the Crusades, but not completed for a couple decades. (The system as originally envisioned was completed in 1992 but Interstate highways continue to be built. Under another view, the final leg of the original system is being completed right now.*)
Planes, I must admit, made a qualitative leap when passenger aircraft started to be jet-powered. (Jets can fly faster, higher, and smoother.) But what has changed much more than the available modes of transportation is their utilization. Fifty, sixty, seventy years ago people commonly rode on trains (just look at old movies). Today many people have never ridden on a train. When Amtrak took over the operation of passenger rail service in America in 1971, it dropped half of the existing trains; many smaller towns, and the small cities where I spent my youth—Scranton, PA and Wilkes-Barre, PA—no longer had any train service.
The flip side of people not relying on trains for their travel was of course the increase in air travel. And not only did planes replace trains for overland travel, planes replaced ships even more completely for trans-oceanic travel. It's still possible to cross the Atlantic on a ship, but our everyday travel—for business and almost as completely for pleasure—now is done on planes. If speed is your criterion, it's no contest: you'll take the plane rather than a ship. And with trains as compared with planes, it's understandable that not many people care to spend two or three days on a train for those longer trips.
Another thing once associated with trains but now long gone is Railway Express. Individuals and businesses could use it to send parcels. Think of it as the predecessor of UPS. I sent a big steamer trunk with my clothes to my new address when I was starting grad school.
___________
*Wikipedia, s.v. Amtrak.
Copyright © 2010 by Richard Stein
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
