Showing posts with label military training. Show all posts
Showing posts with label military training. Show all posts

Saturday, June 9, 2012

Further to My May 27, 2012 Posting, "Some Anti-War Thoughts on Memorial Day"

I just read something interesting. This guy writes,

I think half of us understand firsthand the caring that is at the heart of the U.S. military, but for others of us who are not part of the tradition, we just look from a distance and don't quite get it.

An interesting and provocative idea. I felt the finger was pointing to me as one of those who don't "get it," and that maybe I should re-examine my thinking on the subject.

Well, I feel that I might do so, at least to the degree of making a distinction between the "grunts" on the one hand and the generals (whom I still hate heartily) on the other.

My first-hand experience of the military consists of having been a cadet in Basic ROTC while in college. (I had to take ROTC. I was attending a land-grant college, and two years—that is, "basic" ROTC—was compulsory, though I tried to get out of it. I did manage to graduate with one-half credit hour less of ROTC than was required; it's a long story, how I managed that.)

I chose Air Force ROTC out of the choice of Army, Air Force, and Navy, simply because Air Force ROTC cadets did not drill with a rifle—and I didn't want to touch a gun, even a mock one.

In the late Spring, when the weather might be quite warm, we Air Force cadets had to drill in our heavy wool winter uniforms—the only ones we had—and it was not uncommon for a cadet to collapse from heat on the drill field. So much for "caring" on the part of the higher-ups.

I don't think I would personally like very many military people or veterans. Statistics show that veterans (and, even more so, veterans' organizations) are politically conservative and they vote Republican. And I believe they are consistently hawkish and they love war. They get together to share nostalgic recollections of the good old days of bombing the shit out of tens of thousands of civilians. (I know, that's harsh.)

Even if the lower-ranking personnel are deserving of my sympathy, I think maybe I can draw a parallel with the Catholic Church. I have a friend who is a former Roman Catholic priest. We don't talk very much about his having been a priest and not at all about his leaving the priesthood; it probably had to do with his being gay.

But he has been telling me that it's the Church hierarchy—bishops and so forth—who are conservative and opposed to a lot of social changes both within and without the Church; and—again according to my friend—even the rank-and-file priests are critical of the position of the bishops and the Church hierarchy, and at least in their hearts oppose those conservative forces in their church.

So maybe it's similar with the military: maybe there is a wide chasm between the higher officers and the men in the lower ranks.

My most popular (in terms of number of pageviews) posting on this blog has been the one I titled "The Military Dehumanizes People," posted on May 25, 2009. And I stand by every word of what I said there.

Update: Expanded on June 10, 2012.

Copyright (c) 2012 by Richard Stein

Monday, May 25, 2009

The Military Dehumanizes People

When people enter the military and undergo training, what is one of the first things they are taught? It's called drill. Every person must march in coordination: perfect synchrony, lock-step. Like machines. It seems to me that, if you want machines, you start with machines.

The human identity must be submerged into the whole. (Any Star Trek fans out there remember the Borg?) But that goes against the very nature of what it is to be human: every human being is unique, an individual.

Also, there is the military's insistence on unquestioning obedience to authority. Again, do not think for yourself, do not be a human being, be something mechanical, a machine within a larger machine.

I saw an interesting little video clip not long ago about a robot being developed for the military. Of course it's the ultimate weapon: it won't know fear, it can't be "killed" by chemical or biological weapons, etc. This is what the military has been aiming for for thousands of years: instead of turning humans into machines, we can use real machines to begin with. Think of all the training that will be saved.

Update, December 21, 2012
Scientific fact has a way of imitating science fiction. We have drone airplanes and probably one day the drones of Army A will fight the drones of Army B. And, as I wrote, one day there will probably be drone or android soldiers; think of Star Wars.

Further thought, added November 27, 2013.
The trend toward developing machines to fight our wars brings to mind a clever comic strip of the Seventies called Pogo. To paraphrase Pogo, If you want better machines, you start with machines. I guess the boys in the Pentagon, with their lethal "toys for big boys," recognize this.

Copyright © 2009 by Richard Stein